Venue Receiver used in Reality Show Pilot
This material courtesy of Gotham Sound and Communications,
Inc. Author: Nick Hutson (12/2004)
A recently produced "reality" pilot* presented several challenges
for recording high quality sound while maintaining a smooth and speedy
post production process.
The Game: Two teams of at least four people compete in two separate
rooms. Any additional people could show up at any time. One host sits
in a hallway between these two rooms. As the game is played, team members
run back and forth between the hallway and their room as the host goes
back and forth between groups.
The Requirements: Five Panasonic DVX-100 cameras will cover all the
action across the three areas. All talents must be able to be recorded
all of the time no matter where they are.
The first thought was to go with a more typical reality television
setup: One person with a five channel mixer and a bunch of wireless
receivers in each of the three areas sending a mix to camera. Using
the Lectrosonics 211’s the mixer can select which participant
he or she receives using the LCD screen.
We scrapped this idea for several reasons: First, the set had too many
people on it already. Second, mixing a minimum of four microphones and
shuttling between frequencies increased the chance that something would
be missed in the change, plus the difficulty of mixing a minimum of
four channels on the fly. Instead we decided to record each microphone
to a separate track from a central location. This presented several
issues, including how to give at least thirteen wireless receivers enough
range to span across two separate rooms totaling an area of 7,500 square
feet, and record them for an indefinite period of time.
The new Lectrosonics Venue system presented the most ideal solution
given the number of wireless we were going to need. Having a maximum
of six receivers in one rack space and the ability to loop the antenna
signals gave us maximum flexibility while keeping everything neat and
simple. To ensure that there would not be any range issues, we ran two
antennas to each room and coupled them together with PSC’s RF
MultiMax before running them into the Venue receiver array.
The RF Multimax is a passive RF coupler/active spliter. It is effective
at combining antenna signals and then splitting the (combined) signal
out to receivers, with a minimum amount of crosstalk and fuss. Remember,
any contestant could go anywhere in the loft. We could have just flew
the antennae high in the air and crossed our fingers, but we knew that
once it got going we would be locked into our arrangement. We couldn't
run the receivers to "set", because they were guaranteed to
be in the wrong place 50% of the time. Instead, we ran 2 antennas (Lectro
SNA600) to each of the 2 main "areas", and a 5th antenna to
the hallway between the 2 areas. This way, no contestant was ever farther
than 20 feet from an antenna, no matter where in the loft they roamed.
We used low loss RG-8x between the antenna and the MultiMax, and combined
the antennas within the MultiMax so that each half of the receiver's
diversity RF input "saw" only one antenna from each area in
the loft (the hallway antenna was routed to the diversity RF "A"
antenna input).
The wireless problem solved, one question remained: Which recorder
should we use? The industry standard for multi-track recording has been
the Tascam DA-98. For this situation we would have needed to use at
least two ganged together for a maximum of 16 tracks. There are several
problems with this idea. The first is that DTRS tapes are a maximum
of 113 minutes long and there was a distinct possibility of needing
to record for up to four hours straight. Finally, the DA-98 is based
in a linear world where importing into the editing system would be in
real time and require a DA-98 in post.
We decided that a non-linear recording solution would be needed if
we were to deliver that many tracks to post. The first recorder we considered
was the Fostex PD-6. Unfortunately the media used for the PD-6 lasts
only 35 minutes before needing to change sides, and is limited to six
tracks, thus leaving us with the same problems as the DA-98s. We then
looked at the Aaton Cantar, the Zaxcom Deva V and the Sound Devices
744T. Both could accommodate the recording time we wanted but neither
had the number of tracks necessary for this project.
Enter MetaCorder. With up to 20 tracks and nearly limitless recording,
MetaCorder was the ideal solution to all of our recording problems.
It allowed us to record each mic individually as a Broadcast Wave file,
giving post maximum flexibility and quick import into their Avid Media
Composer. It also enabled us to expand the track count for any unexpected
additions that the production might have, which of course it did: The
original eight contestants quickly expanded to twelve which were easily
accommodated through some quick patching. Time-code was generated by
a Denecke GR-1 and sent to the line input of the Mac Powerbook, which
MetaCorder read and stamped in the Broadcast Wave header of each file
it recorded. In addition, Denecke slates were jammed and the cameras
videotaped the slate at the head of each take.
One issue with the Mac OS X Core Audio drivers is that they can not
yet support two audio devices at once. To date there is no A-D converter
with more than ten analogue inputs that connects to a computer via FireWire.
To solve this problem we decided to use a Metric Halo Mobile I/O as
an A to D converter over ADAT. We then took the eight analogue inputs
of the Mobile I/O into the ADAT port of the MOTU 896 “Mark of
the Unicorn.” Combined with the eight analogue inputs in the MOTU,
we were able to pump a maximum of sixteen tracks of analogue audio into
MetaCorder.
Since we wanted to be able to walk away at the end of the show and
give Production a deliverable with all of the audio on it, we decided
to mirror to both the internal hard drive of our Mac laptop and to an
external LaCie FireWire hard drive. We gave Production the Lacie drive
(they bought it), and we had a backup copy on the laptop, just in case.
For additional backup, we also made two "mixers" - one for
each room - which were sent wirelessly to the main "A" and
"B" camera, and served as our IFB feeds as well.
Power backup was provided by Galaxy Audio's Far Outlet, a combination
33Ah Sealed Lead Acid rechargeable battery, battery charger, and sine-wave
inverter. It basically acted as a "clean" UPS system, and
allowed us (and our electronics) to withstand the vagaries of AC power
on a set.
When all was said and done we recorded thirteen tracks for over two
and a half hours straight. Using MetaCorder together with the Lectrosonics
Venue system, we transformed the production from a difficult day of
over the shoulder mixing mayhem to a relaxed and meticulous recording
session, while giving post production maximum flexibility and yielding
the best sound possible.
Post Script:
Two weeks after production, the directors and editor continue to rave
about the quality of the sound, and the ease that they were able to
import and manipulate the production audio. As a bonus, the DP requested
this system be used for his next project.
One interesting side note: There was a lot of discussion about whether
to record TC on one of the audio tracks of the 100a camera. We resolved
that it would have been useful for the editor, and that on our next
project, we would transmit TC and record it on the right channel. When
we began discussions with the editor of the next show (thanks to the
DP), she said that TC would not be useful on the audio track of the
DV camera, and preferred slates.
Also, this set-up would be a natural to use with Mackie's new Onyx
mixer with Firewire interface. The FW interface provides 16 pre-fade,
pre eq outputs, plus the main mix outs, plus a 2 track DAW (MetaCorder)
return all on one FW cable! We look forward to getting our hands on
them, but right now they are scarce.