Gary’s Wireless Handbook
Another common problem with lav mics is feedback. Users
new to wireless application often complain that a system is defective
because feedback occurs where none was present before. Part of the problem
is that the lav mics typically used with wireless are not directional
and provide little feedback protection. However, the larger problem
is usually that the mobility of wireless allows users to walk into zones
more likely to cause feedback.
Possible solutions lie in use of unidirectional lavaliers or headset
mics. Moving the mic closer to the mouth and lowering gain is also helpful.
However, many users think headset mics are unsightly, and uni lavs do
suffer from sudden drops in level when the wearers turn their heads.
The better solutions are acoustic, either by training users to avoid
feedback zones, or by modifying the loudspeaker configuration to put
feedback zones out of reach.
Lavalier Microphone Mechanical Problems. Mechanical issues are also
common with lav mics, in particular because their cables are small,
often delicate and typically get considerable abuse. Even if not damaged
outright (i.e., the cable pulled out of the mic connector), lav mic
cables eventually wear out. Most often this wear occurs first at the
connector end, but keep in mind that it can also happen at the capsule
end. Usually the cable shield fails first due to constant bending in
the area where a cable leaves the connector’s strain relief.
When this happens, clicks, pops, other noise and “lost audio”
are experienced. Even before there’s a complete break in the shield,
pops and clicks due to RF disturbances can happen. Therefore, it’s
always prudent to check the cables when experiencing lav mic noise of
any type. Breaks at the connector end can usually be repaired (and don’t
forget the bypass capacitors), but a break at the capsule end may not
be fixable.
Mechanical noise due to lavalier mic capsules rubbing on clothing is
relatively common and can usually be eliminated by using the right type
of mic clip, one that holds the capsule away from the fabric. It may
also be necessary to carefully secure the cable near the mic capsule.
Static electricity sometimes creates audio noise, especially with certain
types of fabric. Clothing anti-static spray usually solves this problem.
System Quality. It may seem strange to list “system quality”
as a wireless problem, but a great many wireless difficulties start
with inferior equipment. Inexpensive systems can often work well in
rural areas and/or in relatively undemanding applications.
But in larger cities and their surrounding suburbs plagued by typical
frequency congestion and myriad interference sources, something better
may be required. The same is usually true when more than a few systems
must be operated at the same site. And, this situation is going to worsen,
with 1,000 or so digital television (DTV) transmitters scheduled to
go on air by mid-2002.
The adoption of digital and DSP technology has greatly lowered the
price of many audio products, but the impact of these advantages on
wireless systems has been relatively small to this point. Wireless systems
are still largely analog and RF based, and their manufacture is more
labor intensive due to the requirement of considerable tuning, testing
and tweaking. Quality RF components also tend to be expensive in comparison
to digital components and are less adaptable to low-cost automated assembly.
Unfortunately, there is yet no new magic technology that can cut the
cost of a quality wireless system significantly - say 30 to 40 percent.
Right now, if cost goes down, so do quality and performance. And it’s
easier and cheaper for manufacturers to promote their mic capsules and
“features” rather than build in better performance. Consequently
there is a growing tendency to regard the RF portion of a wireless system
as being relatively unimportant. This is a serious mistake.
If you are a working audio professional with a goal of finding two
channels of wireless mic for less than $400, be careful what you wish
for because you might get it. If the systems don’t have the selectivity
and interference rejection to cut through all the junk in the air, it
doesn’t matter which mic elements they have, how neat all the
new features are, or how much money was “saved”. You’re
simply left with something that doesn’t work like it should.
The recommendation is to pay a little more and go for performance over
features. High-quality wireless systems cost less than one-half what
they did five or six years ago, and they work better in virtually all
cases.
If an application is professional by definition, use professional equipment
to do the job right. As interference grows steadily worse in the future,
this is a decision not likely to be regretted later.
A regular contributor to ProSoundWeb Install Sound, Gary Stanfill is
principle consultant for Colmar Systems, based in Southern California.
His company has provided engineering and marketing consulting services
to wireless microphone manufacturers for several years. Stanfill was
president and general manager of Vega, a leading manufacturer of wireless
microphone systems, for a total of 18 years. He has over 30 years experience
in audio, RF technology, communications and wireless systems. He can
be reached at gjstanfill@earthlink.net
For more articles by Gary, including a look at the potential impact
that DTV will have on wireless systems, click here.
.